rubric

** Semester Project ** ** Evaluation Rubric ** || All of the project entries demonstrate a clear and accurate understanding of the assigned readings. || Most of the project entries demonstrate a clear and accurate understanding of the assigned readings. || Some of the project entries suggest inaccurate, confused, or incomplete understanding of the readings || Many project entries suggest inaccurate, confused, or incomplete understanding of the readings || All project entries are able to accurately apply appropriate ideas, concept(s), or theoretical lenses from readings to the selected artifacts. || Most project entries are able to accurately apply appropriate ideas, concept(s), or theoretical lenses from readings to the selected artifacts. || Some project entries inaccurately or inappropriately apply ideas, concepts, or theoretical lenses from the readings to the new artifact. || Many project entries inaccurately or inappropriately apply ideas, concepts, or theoretical lenses from the readings to the new artifact. || Project entries incorporate multiple, appropriate textual examples from the readings and the artifact(s) to illustrate claims. || Project entries incorporate multiple textual examples from the readings and the artifacts(s) to illustrate claims. || Project entries rely primarily on generalizations or minimal supporting examples to illustrate claims. || Project entries inadequately or inappropriately incorporate textual and other supporting evidence to support claims. || Project entries insightfully examine multiple layers of meaning in the selected artifact, consider alternative perspectives or interpretations, and critically discuss implicit and explicit meaning in the artifact. || Most project entries insightfully examine layers of meaning in the artifact, consider an alternative perspective or interpretation, and identify implicit and explicit meaning in the artifact. || Most project entries identify multiple layers of meaning in the artifact, offer alternative perspective or interpretation, and can recognize implicit and explicit meaning in the artifact. || Some project entries identify more than one layer of meaning, can identify more than one perspective or interpretation, and can recognize implicit and explicit meaning in the artifact. || The project entries make choices appropriate for formal academic writing including formal tone, standard written English, and mechanical and grammatical correctness. || Project entries make appropriate choices for formal academic writing with some minor problems in formal tone, standard written English, and mechanical and grammatical correctness that do not detract from the overall quality. || Project entries generally make appropriate choices for formal academic writing but may have distracting problems with formality, standard written English, and mechanics or grammar. || The project entries have significant distracting problems with formality, standard written English, and mechanics or grammar. || Includes all required entries. || Includes all required entries. || Includes all required entries. || May be short of required entries. ||
 * Women’s Studies 203 **
 * Strong ** ||
 * Good ** ||
 * Intermediate ** ||
 * Developing ** ||
 * Comprehension ** ||
 * Comprehension ** ||
 * Application ** ||
 * Application ** ||
 * Supporting Evidence ** ||
 * Supporting Evidence ** ||
 * Analysis ** ||
 * Analysis ** ||
 * Writing Quality ** ||
 * Writing Quality ** ||
 * Completeness ** ||
 * Completeness ** ||